Gay Parents Press High Court on Adoption Rights
Amended birth certificates that specify the names of a child’s adoptive parents verify family relationships to doctors, insurance agencies and educators.
So like many adoptive parents across the nation, Oren Adar and Mickey Smith wanted to change their son’s birth certificate to have their names on the document instead of those of the birth parents.
But Louisiana officials have blocked them on repeated legal appeals and now the couple’s lawyer is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider hearing the case after it reconvenes in October.
First of all, there are no gay parents. Not by natural reality, and still not by medical fabrication. All there can be is one father or mother who crave same-sex erotic pleasures over the natural ones. Which has not in the least even remotely anything to do with parenthood.
Second, there are parents and adoptive parents. Which are two completely different classifications.
Third, birth parents is a demagogic false term, parents as such are defined by biological parenthood which is the only actual one. That there are nowadays cases, where the genetic mother is not the woman carrying and giving birth to the child, is a perverted monstrosity, inacceptable on moral and ethical terms and a grave offense to the mind and existence of the child.
Fourth, a birth certificate is a birth certificate, therefore supposed to show the actual, factual parents of the child and not anything else. The birth certificate (at least morally and ethically viewed) belongs to the child and serves the child as public proof of his parents. It is not an instrument to serve the narcissist desires and practical purposes of any adoptive parents.
Fifth, there is no technical or otherwise real problem to state the adoptive parents in addition to the actual biological parents, or to issue a certificate of legal representation for a child which would name the adoptive parents. Thus, there is no justification to eradicate the information of biological parenthood from a birth certificate.
Sixth, it is a grave and intolerable violation of the natural rights of a child to withhold from him or from society’s relevant agents and agencies or the state the correct information about his true parents.
To falsify the identity of a childs true, that is biological, parents on any legal document ought to be viewed as a criminal offense and outlawed without exception.
To the degree above assertions are treated as anything but selfevident, society and the state violate reality, morality and ethicality.
To the degree one doubts their relevance one has given in to the radically manipulative, demagogic and misanthropically narcissist zeitgeist.
That parts of the public and the judiciary and politics do deny and defy these assertions is a symptom of spreading inhumanity and moral corruption.
It is every citizens due moral and political right and obligation to protest and resist and act to end such inhumanity and corruption.
In case we care for what has been termed the era of enlightenment, liberty and democracy.