Gay adoptive parents against children’s rights

From Womensenews via ifeminists.net

Gay Parents Press High Court on Adoption Rights

Amended birth certificates that specify the names of a child’s adoptive parents verify family relationships to doctors, insurance agencies and educators.

So like many adoptive parents across the nation, Oren Adar and Mickey Smith wanted to change their son’s birth certificate to have their names on the document instead of those of the birth parents.

But Louisiana officials have blocked them on repeated legal appeals and now the couple’s lawyer is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider hearing the case after it reconvenes in October.

Basics:

First of all, there are no gay parents. Not by natural reality, and still not by medical fabrication. All there can be is one father or mother who crave same-sex erotic pleasures over the natural ones. Which has not in the least even remotely anything to do with parenthood.

Second, there are parents and adoptive parents. Which are two completely different classifications.

Third, birth parents is a demagogic false term, parents as such are defined by biological parenthood which is the only actual one. That there are nowadays cases, where the genetic mother is not the woman carrying and giving birth to the child, is a perverted monstrosity, inacceptable on moral and ethical terms and a grave offense to the mind and existence of the child.

Fourth, a birth certificate is a birth certificate, therefore supposed to show the actual, factual parents of the child and not anything else. The birth certificate (at least morally and ethically viewed) belongs to the child and serves the child as public proof of his parents. It is not an instrument to serve the narcissist desires and practical purposes of any adoptive parents.

Fifth, there is no technical or otherwise real problem to state the adoptive parents in addition to the actual biological parents, or to issue a certificate of legal representation for a child which would name the adoptive parents. Thus, there is no justification to eradicate the information of biological parenthood from a birth certificate.

Sixth, it is a grave and intolerable violation of the natural rights of a child to withhold from him or from society’s relevant agents and agencies or the state the correct information about his true parents.

To falsify the identity of a childs true, that is biological, parents on any legal document ought to be viewed as a criminal offense and outlawed without exception.

To the degree above assertions are treated as anything but selfevident, society and the state violate reality, morality and ethicality.

To the degree one doubts their relevance one has given in to the radically manipulative, demagogic and misanthropically narcissist zeitgeist.

That parts of the public and the judiciary and politics do deny and defy these assertions is a symptom of spreading inhumanity and moral corruption.

It is every citizens due moral and political right and obligation to protest and resist and act to end such inhumanity and corruption.

In case we care for what has been termed the era of enlightenment, liberty and democracy.

Advertisements

Recent Posts

Kategorien

RSS Fathers and Families

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS The Spearhead

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Men’s Rights – Reddit

  • Best initial "red pill" resource?
  • How to argue "teach men not to rape"?
  • Male politician labelled 'pervert' in national paper-Because he disagreed with feminists who demand a new law SPECIFICALLY giving automatic prison sentences for men taking 'Upskirting' photos. Today, they hung panties on his home "to shame him". The reality of free speech under feminism
  • Guy's GF touches men at work. Women respond with "just chill out, its totally normal to touch men at work" or "its ok because they dont say anything about being touched". If a man had touched women at work, he'd be publicly shamed and fired from his job!
  • Boy left homeless because of misandric sisters
  • Ozone Park residents angered over plans to bring men’s homeless shelter to neighborhood. “I’m not saying no to a homeless shelter," resident Angela Nocerino said. "You could put families there. You could put women there. Children without a home."
  • I guess science is "sexist" now
  • Man is accused of molesting his daughter by his ex-wife. Both take polygraph test. Man passes test (he didn't molest his daughter), and ex-wife fails test.
  • Imgur post: It can happen to guys, too.
  • Yet another male feminist comedian accused of sexual abuse.

RSS Medrum

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Advertisements