Male stripper and pornography actor as teacher

UK Porn star teacher to return to classroom
Topic: Porn, Prostitution, and Sexual Freedom
Source: The Guardian (UK)
A sex education teacher who also worked as a stripper under the stage name Johnny Anglais has been found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct but permitted to continue teaching. Benedict Garrett, 31, who was head of personal, social and health education at Beal high school in Ilford, Essex, was given a reprimand after a two-day disciplinary hearing of the General Teaching Council on Wednesday. The disciplinary committee heard that Garrett had been stripping in clubs while he was employed at the school. The school investigated Garrett after pupils discovered a trailer for a pornographic film in which he featured. (30/08/11)

From ifeminsts.net.

Comment: Would you send your child into this school?

Garrett argued that “a significant portion” of the public did not find his behaviour immoral or regard it as incompatible with teaching. He questioned why other behaviours which led to harm – including smoking, drinking or overeating – were tolerated by the teaching profession and said that his involvement in the porn industry was not harmful.

How smart an argumentation. Obviously smart enough for the arguably critically derailed staff of teachers there. No word about any reaction of parents in the Guardian article. Instead the chairman of the panel (of the discipline committee) is quoted with

“You have stated that you will continue to advocate the morality and acceptability of your involvement in the adult industry and argue that it should not be inappropriate for a teacher to work as a stripper or in pornographic films.

“However, the committee is content that you recognise the widely held public view that such work is not acceptable conduct for a teacher. Therefore, in relation to risk of repetition, the committee considers it is unlikely that you will seek to return to the teaching profession whilst working as a stripper or in pornographic films.”

God save the queen!

At least the Telegraph has a (extra cute looking) woman answer the defiant boy,

No, Mr Garrett, porn is not ‘completely natural’

And to the panel? So it’s not about what he teaches about the morals and ethics of sexuality? But the question is supposed to be wether he makes money with his penis at the same time (which by the way is not only pornography but at the same time prostitution, no matter what legal definitions might say)?

Can you get it? These pedagogues cannot make up their mind to call stripping or pornographic acting immoral? Or is it, they are forbidden to do so? By law? By the ethical codex of the British education system? Do they fear protests or lawsuits from the strippers or the pornography unions?

Is that what one ought to call “black pedadogy”? Pitch-black?

Not that Jenny McCarney with her cute snout actually cares about the children. How could she and why should she. All she is prepared to care about is herself, her own sexual race. So she laments about misogyny and mistreated girls. Isn’t that completely natural, should’t I get over with it? Or do I hear a voice telling me, “No, it’s not completely natural that female writers care only about their own sex whatever the issue at hand is!”

A further description of the lowliness of this teacher, “head of personal, social and health education” from the British Huffington Post:

Under the pseudonym of Johnny Anglais, Garrett advertised his services for stripping, lap dancing and serving food at dinner parties dressed as a naked butler. His online gallery showed him posing as a fireman, policeman and a nearly naked “gentleman”.

His website, where Garrett describes himself as a “man with a mission”, could be easily accessed by pupils. Garrett describes his “mission” to “unashamedly demonstrate the art of pleasure in the realms of fitness, sex and entertainment.”

At least I am not the only one daring to have not the least respect or tolerance for this piece of silly meat nor for the pieces of silly mind who are willing to let him teach again. The Imperfect Parent tells me:

Norman Wells, part of a group that defends the welfare of young people in public policy, disagreed with the ruling to allow Garrett to resume teaching, reportedly saying, “The vast majority of parents would be uncomfortable, to say the least, to have their children taught by someone involved in the sleazy world of the sex industry.”

Which is, for heaven’s sake, more than Jenny, the Telegraph bunny offers:

But if I had ever found out, years ago, that one of my teachers was up to that sort of caper, I would have been too helpless with crazy laughter ever to learn anything useful from them again: I don’t expect pupils today are much different.

The media of the English speaking realm seem to have turned mush in moral regards.

But when the assertion of normative morality is frowned upon and avoided as if bearing the moral deficiency of intolerance or the moral immaturity of fundamentalism, the young end up as narcissist lost souls without an understanding of human dignity.

Most papers do not even rise ever so much up to the reality of calling pornography such but speak of “adult” movies instead.

No, I am an adult and a man and a father and I am ashamed of the existence of that business being treated as just another aspect of our multi-cultural and multi-ethical world of diversity. Pornography is the direct antithesis to adulthood. It is serving and provoking a regressive way of expression of sexuality. It is a symptom of a civilizational drama, the stimulation and exploitation of primitive desires for profit. It dehumanizes and degrades sexuality, and of course does so to both sexes. Whereby the boys get a much more cynically destructive message than the girls, as they are presented with caricatures of men reduced to grunting vibrators with extra long lasting batteries. Almost incomprehensible that women and men act so blind that they do not pinpoint and lament the fact that men’s pleasure is either basically cut out of the picture completely or presented as an embarrassingly akward and stupid sight the audience hopes to pass by as quickly as possible. Pornography is a, however distorted, celebration of women’s and exclusively women’s pleasures.

Anyone concerned about this double taboo, in the pornography as well as in the discussion of it? Hardly, gynocentric sexism is no problem for the feminist agenda. Girls rule, boys drool – so what?


Recent Posts

Kategorien

RSS News from Mensactivism

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Fathers and Families

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS The Spearhead

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Men’s Rights – Reddit

  • Stop telling men to show their emotions.
  • Chicago Tribune report finds 89.4% of shooting victims are male. The front page headline? "Impact of violence on girls is too often overlooked"
  • Can you just FEEL the male privilege oozing from this email I got?
  • The Red Pill on Netflix.
  • Trailer for new feminist MTV show has women stabbing and beating up men because equality
  • 1/3 domestic violence victims now men. Yet it is still considered a gendered crime against women. Why?
  • This year the awarded most attractive men in the world will lose hundreds of millions to their divorcing wives: Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt and now George Clooney too: his wife is ready to get at least $ 300 million dollars from him
  • Madonna claims music industry is "blatant misogynist and sexist against women". Official statistics though show that the top 4 highest paid in the world in the music industry are: Taylor Swift, Adele, rihanna and herself
  • Over 120 men kill themselves in UK after being arrested and released on alleged sex offences. Yet "the report said sex offenders, especially those who committed offences against children, were likely to feel high levels of shame" -- well maybe the Presumption of Guilt could explain it?
  • Mesa PD and City Prosecutor’s Office Charges Man With Domestic Violence For Not Answering The Phone!