Bible readings are offensive material?

From The Daily Mail via Ifeminists:

Postal workers refuse to deliver Bible recordings because the CDs are ‘offensive’

Postal workers refused to deliver CDs of Bible readings after deciding they were ‘offensive material’.

Several churches had paid for discs with recordings of St Mark’s Gospel to be produced to celebrate the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible.

They were due to be delivered to all households on the Channel Island of Jersey, but church leaders were stunned when they were told postal workers would not handle the 45,000 CDs.

Well, at the end they got their act together and apologized for the affront. After the church officials protested the offensive mistreatment.

Well, once more, let’s face it. Those presumed creeps felt like heros of resistance against the evil. Who told them so? The government, who else. And all they desire ist to be good citizens. That good citizens are people who don’t let the government tell them what is good or evil, has not come to their awareness, yet. They did not read George Orwell nor Aldous Huxley, or, if they did they would not understand the message.

This is the decline of citizenry, the latest rise of the authoritarian character, submissive and compliant to tv shows’ and yellow press’ gospel. Which in turn are the publication channels for the authoritarian government’s politics of propaganda and thought control.

Whereby the “government” is the political class as a whole, the new nobility, including the NGOs of national and international origin. It is a global government of indoctrination by the media. Self-censorship and Gleichschaltung, as the term famous from the Nazi-regime tells, a global party-line of the global fundamentalist Ersatzreligion, the replacement for religion proper.

It figures under the terms of human rights doctrine, of poitical correctness, of equality, of  – obviously – non-offensiveness, of tolerance, of multiculturalism, of secularity, of inclusiveness, of respect. They do not care for the cynical selfcontradiction in their violent paternalism, which in fact is maternalism, nannyism in the bigot Victorian sense. They are every bit as authoritarian and totalitarian as the Khmer Rouge, as Mao, as Stalin, as Hitler, as any tyrant or tyrannical regime of history. The only difference is in the self-labeling as the opposite of authoritarian, they glory in their selfdefinition as anti-authoritarian.

But that is what Orwell illustrated so ruthlessly – the ruthless demagoguery.

They are by far the worst ilk of imperialist missionaries the world has ever seen. They are deadly serious in their project to eradicate religion, spirituality, morality, nationality and sexual identity. They are out to fabricate the new man. The one who is liberated from identity as such, who defines himself – or rather – herself or him/her/itself or *self according to his/her/it mood of the moment, who constructs, deconstructs and reconstructs  his/her/it identity according to purpose and liking.

They don’t know what they’re doing, therefore God forgive them! Which is not a suggestion to accept or tolerate their destructive mission, at all. On the contrary, they are to be fought without compromise, without slacking, relentlessly until their bubble pops into thin air.

They will eventually see their demise, be it after decades of global governmental terrorism of police-state and thought-control, or without that period of tyranny blooming. For the sake of avoiding the waste of lives and time for humanity, make it your pledge to put them to the gutter whenever you are confronted by their black magic!

They are everyone who falls for the hypnotic spell of hypocrisy. They are therefore everywhere, where ego-weakness opens the doors of the mind for the evil spirits to possess one, in myriads.

To immunize yourself you got to invest in enlightenment, in overcoming the inertia and the cowardice which prevent one from thinking for oneself, from trusting one’s own good sense when flooded with the beguilment of selfrighteousness.

And we ought to help our neighbor, as much or as little that is possible. It is the individual standing against the powers of the media, the political class, the law, the justice system, the education system, the very texture of all public voices.

One might feel the desperate need to take refuge – in religion, in spirituality, in traditions of ethics and morality, in literature of days past. As long as the censorship has not progressed onto forbidding and rewriting the whole canon of cultural heritage, one can gather what is reassuring for the sanity of what used to be respected as common sense and moral conscience.

As you might have learnt, they have begun to forbid schoolbooks to be used and children’s books to be reprinted when they stem from the era where everyone was clear about the fact that there are only two sexes which are not to be called genders, where a child had exactly two parents, a mother and a father, and the anus was not an organ for sexual intercourse but for defecation.

If they do not call you a sexist, misogynist, homophobic, patriarchial bigot, you probably have already fallen for the delusion they spread.

Prove them wrong by your thinking and by your speaking, for the sake of your children and grandchildren, even for the sake of your grandchildren’s grandchildren!

 

Advertisements

Recent Posts

Kategorien

RSS Fathers and Families

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS The Spearhead

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Men’s Rights – Reddit

  • Best initial "red pill" resource?
  • How to argue "teach men not to rape"?
  • Male politician labelled 'pervert' in national paper-Because he disagreed with feminists who demand a new law SPECIFICALLY giving automatic prison sentences for men taking 'Upskirting' photos. Today, they hung panties on his home "to shame him". The reality of free speech under feminism
  • Guy's GF touches men at work. Women respond with "just chill out, its totally normal to touch men at work" or "its ok because they dont say anything about being touched". If a man had touched women at work, he'd be publicly shamed and fired from his job!
  • Boy left homeless because of misandric sisters
  • Ozone Park residents angered over plans to bring men’s homeless shelter to neighborhood. “I’m not saying no to a homeless shelter," resident Angela Nocerino said. "You could put families there. You could put women there. Children without a home."
  • I guess science is "sexist" now
  • Man is accused of molesting his daughter by his ex-wife. Both take polygraph test. Man passes test (he didn't molest his daughter), and ex-wife fails test.
  • Imgur post: It can happen to guys, too.
  • Yet another male feminist comedian accused of sexual abuse.

RSS Medrum

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Advertisements