A Straightforward Criminal Split

The Daily Mail writes:

The rise of manimony: Meet the women making huge sacrifices to pay thousands in alimony to their former husbands

By Clare Goldwin


When novelist Milly Johnson divorced her  husband it was an apparently straightforward split. She kept the family home, got custody of their young sons and her maintenance payments came to about £1,000 a month.

A fairly modest sum, you might think, when you factor in the expense of clothing, feeding and raising two boys.

Except this was not money Milly received from her husband, but financial support she was paying to him. The 47-year-old mother of two found herself in the unexpected, but increasingly common, position of having to pay alimony — or ‘manimony’ as it has been dubbed — to her cash-strapped ex-husband after their marriage broke down.

No Clare, it was not an apparently straightforward split. It was the usual ordinary crime against the father and the children for the emotional profit of the mother. It was the usual crime against the natural and interminable rights of a father and of his children.

So it was and still is a straightforward crime, and nothing less. And the judge as well as the mother ought to be punished for committing it.

And again, no Clare. Alimony was never dubbed womanimony, and therefore there is not the least of rights to now call it manimony. And that you even make it an issue for an article is a flagrant offense against husbands and fathers and an equally flagrant elating of mothers over fathers, a sexual racist spitting.

What a piece of slandering vindictive lard the whining ex-wife is shows the following:

‘My ex-husband was a self-employed window fitter but by the end of our marriage he was bringing hardly any money at all into the home. He’d tell me that contractors owed him and I believed him, although I  suspect that he was setting off for work and then going to the pub.’

Why did you not interview the ex-husband and give him a chance to utter some equivalent to the above put-down. What are you, a journalist or a campaigner to derogate men?

So with more women than ever being the main breadwinner — figures from the Office for National Statistics showed this week how women in their 20s are surging ahead of men in the pay stakes — it’s not surprising more are having to pay out when marriages unfortunately fail.

Oh, sure. That is why you make an article of it?

‘For women it’s like rubbing salt into the wound that they not only have to deal with the emotional fallout of divorce, but they have to pay out money too. It’s like signing up to a hire purchase and then realising the goods are shoddy but you still having to pay for them.

What a yucky jerk, this woman! What do you think, it has been for men, forever? Different? In what way?

‘I am not prepared to carry on funding a man who is perfectly able to work and has been simply living off me since the divorce.’

Yep. That’s exactly what millions of men do think year after year, since eternity!

‘And women feel very strongly that they’ve already had to do it all by  supporting the family financially and keeping the plates spinning at home, so it makes them very angry with their ex husbands.’
Dumb narcissist selfidolaters, stop your selfrighteous indignation! Your anger does not count, not before the trillion-fold amount of anger of divorced men is appreciated and published as righteous.

Yeah, honey, men did that for not only decades but centuries. So woman up and gulp it down and pay! And, give the custody to him, so that you know how it really feels to be a divorced man and father, that you get a real feel of equality!

Aren’t you all for equality, more than the Pope is for God?

And what is the worst, all of the three arrogant cows depicted have the custody of the children though they have no time to care for them as they are too busy to make money.

To repeat it, babes: You will only know what it means to be treated equally to a man, if he got the custody of the children and you have to pray to God that he does not get the idea to prevent you from seeing them!


Recent Posts


RSS News from Mensactivism

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Fathers and Families

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS The Spearhead

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Men’s Rights – Reddit

  • MensRights think tank: So we pinpoint an issue we want to fix. How do we go about fixing it in the most efficient and effective manner?
  • Who should we donate to to support men's rights?
  • Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.
  • 16 years ago a female therapist molested a female patient. She received a 30-day suspension and is now the president of a college...
  • Feminism is Ideology, Not Academic Discipline, "Modern feminism isn’t compatible with science" -- Dr. Alex Berezow, a biomedical scientist with a doctorate in microbiology
  • WATCH: Psychologist Leaves Reporter Speechless Explaining Why Free Speech Trumps Someone's 'Right' To Not Be Offended
  • "A woman tricked me to become pregnant and I am devastated" "It’s been one of the most terrible situations, I almost ended my life because of it" (Irish Times)
  • How come when a girl feels pressured to act a certain way, it’s because society imposes unfair standards and expectations on her, but when a boy feels pressure to act a certain way, it’s “fragile masculinity”?
  • "Feminist Edit-a-Thon" Destroying Wikipedia's Objectivity
  • This restaurant only has a Women’s and an all gender bathroom... No Men’s.