Nur Männer können in Indien wegen Ehebruchs vor Gericht gestellt werden

Aus The Hindu:

“The mere fact that the appellant is a woman makes her completely immune to the charge of adultery, and she cannot be proceeded against is evident from a plain reading of Section 497…”

“Die bloße Tatsache, daß die Berufungskägerin eine Frau ist macht sie gegen einen Vorwurf des Ehebruchs vollständig immun, und es kann gegen sie nicht vorgegangen werden, ergibt sich aus einer einfachen Lektüre von Abschnitt 497 …”

Eine Ehefrau hat eine angebliche Rivalin wegen Ehebruchs angezeigt. Die hat gegen die Zulassung der Klage Berufung eingelegt und recht bekommen – mit der Begründung oben.

Nur Männer können in Indien wegen Ehebruchs vor Gericht gestellt werden.

Advertisements

Recent Posts

Kategorien

RSS News from Mensactivism

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Fathers and Families

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS The Spearhead

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Men’s Rights – Reddit

  • How can the mens rights movement improve itself? What flaws should be adressed?
  • Please list reports of sexual based false allegations for political reasons on college campuses for RagingFreedom.com feature
  • A man helped a lost toddler find her parents, police say. He was smeared online as a predator and fled town.
  • Oh silly me. I thought she had raped him. With him being 11 and all.
  • Anita Sarkeesian's astounding 'garbage human' moment | A textbook demonstration of how feminists use fake victimhood and claims of female weakness for political ends
  • Feminists/SJWs whine about "lack of diversity" in Dunkirk. *FACEPALM!*
  • Seeing women post this constantly on facebook not knowing it was halted because it was causing permanent infertility. Nope men are just babies.
  • A man helped a lost toddler find her parents, police say. He was smeared online as a predator, then fled town
  • In the future, society will view circumcision similarly to how we view Chinese foot binding today
  • Just more proof that Anita Snarkeesian is a big fat lying crybully.